201-880-7213

New York Subrogation Case Law Upheld by Third Department

Those familiar with subrogation, liens on third-party lawsuits, and Section 29 of the New York Workers’ Compensation Law may be able to recite the holdings of Matter of Kelly v. State Ins. Fund.  and Burns v. Varriale by heart.  For a quick review, the Kelly case dealt with a widow whose husband had passed away in the course of employment.  The Court of Appeals held that an insurance carrier’s equitable share of the litigation costs and disbursements incurred by a claimant must be apportioned based on the total benefit received.  Inclusive in this total benefit is the relief obtained by the Workers’ Compensation carrier of its obligation to make future benefit payments to the claimant.  However, and most importantly, the Court of Appeals noted that when the carrier’s future benefit is “speculative,” it would be inappropriate to apportion attorney’s fees based on such benefit.

The Burns case highlighted a situation where the future benefit is speculative.  Unlike the situation in Kelly, when the death of the employee can result in a fixed rate payable to the dependent spouse, the Burns employee was awarded a reduced earnings weekly benefit, based on having sustained a permanent partial disability.  Because the reduced earnings could fluctuate based on future wages earned by the employee, the Court of Appeals ruled that the Workers’ Compensation insurance carrier’s future benefit was indeed speculative.  Therefore, the carrier was entitled to a reimbursement of its Section 29 lien, after deducting its pro-rated share of the employee’s third-party litigation costs and expenses.

On May 19, 2016, the Third Department issued its opinion in Matter of Terranova v. Lehr Constr. Co.2016 N.Y. App. Div. LEIXS 3839, 2016 NY Slip Op 03947.  In that case, the Workers’ Compensation carrier consented to a third-party settlement, which involved reimbursement of its lien.  A Workers’ Compensation Law Judge later ruled that the employee was entitled to a schedule loss of use award, but that no “fresh money” would be moving because of the carrier’s rights pursuant to Kelly.  Specifically, because the schedule loss of use award was a fixed benefit, i.e. not speculative, the employee was not entitled to ongoing payments for litigation expenses.

The fact that the Third Department still must differentiate between fixed and speculative future benefits only indicates that questions still plague both claimants and insurance carriers.

Later this year, I will participate in a Webinar, part of our monthly webinar series, that will outline the current law and answer any questions on the topic of subrogation in New York workers’ compensation claims.  For any questions you may have prior to that Webinar, please feel free to contact me at CSison@Lois-LLC.com.

Download the New York Workers’ Compensation Law Handbook

Download Our New York Workers’ Compensation Law Handbook

The 2023 edition of Gregory Lois’ practical, up-to-date, and easy-to-understand guide to workers’ compensation claims in New York.

This book is designed for employers, attorneys, claim adjusters, physicians, self-insured employers and vocational rehabilitation workers.

Download Now

Learn More About New York Workers’ Compensation Defense at LOIS

We represent insurance carriers, self-insured employers, third party claim administrators, and employers before the New York State Workers' Compensation Board. We handle cases from cradle-to-grave. We want to be by your side, moving cases aggressively to closure from the start of litigation all the way through to settlement.

We only assign one attorney and one paralegal to each case. This means that your team members always have one contact to go to for any questions. We do not have 'hearing attorney' or a 'negotiation attorney' or 'appeal department' or anything else! All of our attorneys handle all of those roles – meaning cases are not 'passed around' as they move through the litigation process. Your risk professional or adjuster always knows who is assigned – because the attorney does not change.

Learn More

Get articles delivered to your inbox, once a month.

Subscribe Today!