Firm News

New York Court of Appeals Rules Amendment to §25-a Is Constitutional

What is the Fund?

As a background, §25-a provides for a Special Fund to be set up especially to administer and pay claims arising from the reopening of closed cases. The primary purpose of §25-a is to transfer liability for awards from self-insured employers and insurance carriers to the Special Fund where the claim has become “stale.” Under §25-a, claim is “stale” if it meets certain criteria:

  1. more than seven years has elapsed from the date of the injury or death, and;
  2. where more than three years has elapsed after the last payment of compensation.

Essentially, insurance carriers and self-insured employers could potentially shift liability to the Special Fund in claims that met the criteria of §25-a. Whether a case has been officially closed so as to shift liability to the Special Fund is a decision for the Board to make. Upon transfer to the Special Fund, the carrier or self-insured employer is no longer responsible for payment or management of the claim.

The Law was changed in 2013 to close the Fund to new claims.

In an effort to phase out the Special Fund/Fund for Reopened Cases, the Business Relief Act of 2013 created an amendment to §25-a that no application by an employer or insurance carrier to transfer liability to the Fund for Reopened Cases would be accepted by the Board on or after January 1, 2014. In short, the amendment to be addressed in American Economy Ins. Co. v State of New York closed the reopened case fund to newly reopened claims as of January 1, 2014. Following the amendment to §25-a, any claims that were reopened that previously would have transferred to the Fund became the obligation of the carrier, liability would not shift to the Special Fund.

On October 24, 2017, the Court of Appeals ruled that retroactive closure of the Fund for Reopened Cases was not unconstitutional.

Insurance carriers and self-insured employers have been waiting anxiously for the Court of Appeals to render a decision of the appeal filed by The State of New York and will not be happy with the ruling.

The New York Appellate Division previously ruled that a 2013 amendment to New York Workers’ Compensation Law §25-a which closed the Special Fund for Reopened Cases (the Fund) to new applications after January 1, 2014 was unconstitutional as applied to policies issued before October 1, 2013.
In yesterday’s decision, the Court of Appeals (highest state court) ruled Workers’ Compensation Law § 25-a (1-a) as applied to policies issued before October 1, 2013 is not unconstitutional. The Court of Appeals held the amendment’s retroactive impact is constitutionally permissible and any retroactive impact of the legislation is justified by a rational legislative purpose

Impact of this new decision

For now, the Fund remains closed. You can anticipate further litigation. The next step will be the United States Supreme Court, presuming they agree to hear the case.

Download the New York Workers’ Compensation Law Handbook

Download Our New York Workers’ Compensation Law Handbook

The 2023 edition of Gregory Lois’ practical, up-to-date, and easy-to-understand guide to workers’ compensation claims in New York.

This book is designed for employers, attorneys, claim adjusters, physicians, self-insured employers and vocational rehabilitation workers.

Download Now

Learn More About New York Workers’ Compensation Defense at LOIS

We represent insurance carriers, self-insured employers, third party claim administrators, and employers before the New York State Workers' Compensation Board. We handle cases from cradle-to-grave. We want to be by your side, moving cases aggressively to closure from the start of litigation all the way through to settlement.

We only assign one attorney and one paralegal to each case. This means that your team members always have one contact to go to for any questions. We do not have 'hearing attorney' or a 'negotiation attorney' or 'appeal department' or anything else! All of our attorneys handle all of those roles – meaning cases are not 'passed around' as they move through the litigation process. Your risk professional or adjuster always knows who is assigned – because the attorney does not change.

Learn More

Get articles delivered to your inbox, once a month.

Subscribe Today!