Winning Results

PTSD Claim Disallowed Over Fear of Contracting COVID

The Claimant was a delivery driver that alleges in March 2020, he had panic attacks due to making deliveries in crowded grocery stores at the start of the pandemic. He alleged that as a result of the stress at the time, he was diagnosed with both post-traumatic stress disorder. A few days after the panic attacks, the Claimant went on leave and never returned to work.

During the trial, the Claimant testified that he last worked in March 2020. The Claimant testified made deliveries to stores and that he would be there at the time same time as the public. The Claimant testified in March 2020, he couldn’t breathe, as the stores were chaotic and overwhelmed with people fleeing the pandemic in Manhattan. During cross-examination, the Claimant conceded that he did not actually contract COVID-19 as a result of his employment of being in grocery stores. Of note, the Claimant conceded that other individuals at work had the same concerns and fears about the pandemic as he did.

The Claimant’s direct supervisor testified that he was worried about bringing home to his partner as well and that he did not just hear these concerns from the Claimant; it was everyone. He testified that he told employees to take whatever measures they felt necessary to protect themselves, which included buying PPE, which was not readily available at the time. A different supervisor testified that all of his employees were dealing with the same conditions at the start of the pandemic. He testified that he treated all his employees in the same way. He testified that when the pandemic started in February 2020, there was no government mandate in place regarding PPE. He testified that everyone was allowed to take a leave without penalty, employment was protected, and no one was forced to work.

To have a compensable mental injury caused by work related stress in the workplace the Claimant must prove that the stress that was experienced was greater than that experienced by employees who are similarly situated workers in the normal work environment. This is a question of fact for the Board to resolve under WCL §2(7). The Law Judge found the claim to be compensable, essentially stating that the standard did not apply, and the Claimant’s situation was unique, noting that the area in question in question received an influx of people and as a result it was not a normal work environment. LOIS attorney, Jeremy Janis, filed an appeal.

In the appeal, we argued that the testimony of the Claimant and the employer witnesses about their fear showed that all of the delivery drivers had the same fears and the stress experienced was not greater that a similarly situated worker. Based on the concession of the Claimant and the testimony of the employer witnesses, a disallowance was obtained from the Board Panel. The Board Panel specifically found that all of the drivers experienced the same level of stress at the time, specifically noting the testimony obtained at trial. The standard of WCL 2(7) had not been met. As a result of the disallowance, the Carrier is not responsible for over two years of medical bills. Further, precedent was not set that may have created a slippery slope, as any individual could allege a fear of contracting COVID due to their employment at the start of the pandemic.

Download the New York Workers’ Compensation Law Handbook

Download Our New York Workers’ Compensation Law Handbook

The 2023 edition of Gregory Lois’ practical, up-to-date, and easy-to-understand guide to workers’ compensation claims in New York.

This book is designed for employers, attorneys, claim adjusters, physicians, self-insured employers and vocational rehabilitation workers.

Download Now

Learn More About New York Workers’ Compensation Defense at LOIS

We represent insurance carriers, self-insured employers, third party claim administrators, and employers before the New York State Workers' Compensation Board. We handle cases from cradle-to-grave. We want to be by your side, moving cases aggressively to closure from the start of litigation all the way through to settlement.

We only assign one attorney and one paralegal to each case. This means that your team members always have one contact to go to for any questions. We do not have 'hearing attorney' or a 'negotiation attorney' or 'appeal department' or anything else! All of our attorneys handle all of those roles – meaning cases are not 'passed around' as they move through the litigation process. Your risk professional or adjuster always knows who is assigned – because the attorney does not change.

Learn More

Get articles delivered to your inbox, once a month.

Subscribe Today!