We are proud to announce that defense litigator Tashia Rasul has been elevated to partner at Lois LLC effective today. In addition to her trial practice, Tashia leads the Firm’s Diversity Committee. Tashia is active in the National Alliance of Women in Workers’ Compensation, a think tank of engaged female thought leaders committed to discussing challenges and emerging trends in the Workers’ Compensation industry.
Tashia has been an integral part of the growth and development of Lois LLC, as we expand our attorney capacity to serve our clients. We are committed to meeting our client’s needs and developing and promoting the best workers’ compensation defense litigators.
For workers’ compensation claims with dates of accident or dates of disablement during the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017, the maximum weekly benefit rate will be $864.32. This is an increase from the old rate which was set at $844.29.
How is the Maximum rate Calculated?
Since July 1, 2010, the maximum weekly benefit rate for workers’ compensation claimants has been two-thirds of the New York State average weekly wage for the previous calendar year, as determined by the New York State Department of Labor (Workers’ Compensation Law §§ 2(16);15(6)). The Department of LaborLink to External Website reported to the Superintendent of the Department of Financial Services that the New York State average weekly wage for 2015 was $1,296.48. Continue reading New York’s Benefit Rate Increases Today.
What is Labor Market Attachment
In New York, a temporarily partially disabled claimant must demonstrate an attachment to the labor market to be entitled to continuing compensation benefits. A recently filed Full Board Decision increased the claimant’s burden of proof for a sufficient finding of attachment to the labor market (Matter of Suffolk County Health Services). Raising the issue of labor market attachment is beneficial in reducing the overall exposure of the claim as it may result in a suspension of benefits due to the claimant’s failure to attach themselves to the labor market. Also, the exposure of the claim may be reduced if the claimant is successful in finding new employment as a result of the carrier raising the issue of labor market attachment. Continue reading Challenging Labor Market Attachment in New York
Here is the post-webinar video from our most recent presentation, “The Going-and-Coming Defense in New Jersey” which discusses legal defenses available under the New Jersey Workers’ Compensation Act and case law. To join us for our monthly webinars on New York and New Jersey workers’ compensation law, Click here to register.
Subject: New Jersey, Workers’ Compensation Law, Defenses
Date Presented: June 27, 2016
Presenter(s): Greg Lois, Esq.
Run time: 25:45
The complete archive of prior presentations is here. Continue reading Post-Webinar Video: The Going-and-Coming Defense in New Jersey
Injuries Commuting to Work Generally Not Compensable.
Under the New York Workers’ Compensation Law there is a presumption that if an accident occurs in the course of employment it is presumed to arise out the employment. The “coming and going rule” under the Workers’ Compensation Law states that employees are not deemed to be in the course of their employment when they are traveling to-and from-work. Additionally, the risks inherent in traveling to and from work relate to the employment only in the most marginal sense. Matter of Neacosia v. New York Power Authority, 85 NY2d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep’t 1995); Matter of Davis v. Labor Ready, 69 A.D.3d 1214, 1215 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep’t 2010). Thus, an injury that occurs during such commuting activities is typically not compensable. Exceptions to this general rule are recognized where there exists some reasonable nexus between the risk to which a claimant was exposed and the employment.
In that regard, only if an injury flows as a natural consequence of the employee’s duties can it be said to arise out of the employment. Similarly, for an injury to occur in the course of employment, “[i]t must have been received while the employee was doing the work for which he was employed.” Lemon v. New York City Transit Authority, 72 N.Y.2d 324, 326-327 (N.Y. 1988); Malacarne v. Yonkers Parking Authority, 41 N.Y.2d 189, 190 (N.Y. 1976) “A purely fortuitous coincidence of time and place is not enough. There must be a causal relationship or nexus between the accident and the employment.” Id. Continue reading Coming and Going Rule: A Review of the New York Case Law
Why is Average Weekly Wage important?
One of the most fundamental aspects of workers’ compensation are the indemnity benefits paid to the injured workers. The purpose is to compensate the injured employee for the time lost from their work due to their on-the-job injury. These benefits are tax exempt, and as such are calculated at a 33% reduction from the employee’s gross salary amount subject to a maximum and minimum which changes every year. The means by which the compensation rate is established is based on the Average Weekly Wage (AWW). This AWW becomes the basis for all monetary calculations the Workers’ Compensation Board will make throughout the duration of the claim. As such, it is important that the AWW is properly calculated at the outset of the claim.
Several factors are considered when making the AWW calculation. Has this injured worker been employed for at least 52 weeks prior to the date of injury? If they have, then their gross salary for that 52 week period will serve as the basis for the AWW calculation. If however, they were employed for less than 52 weeks prior to their injury, then the payroll records of another employee will be directed for submission to the Board. In this instance, the similar worker should be in the same field and preferably in the same position, earning similar wages as the injured worker. The similar worker’s salary and days worked will be adapted and applied in calculating the injured employee’s AWW. Continue reading Calculating Average Weekly Wage in New York Claims